Onboarding and screening · September 2026
What venues ask for before you trade
One test decides who is entered here: the sign-in a venue's own onboarding pages document has to be a signature from a wallet the trader already holds, and nothing else beside it. Sixteen venues were read against that test, and the register is where the ones that pass are filed.
8of 16
On the register — a wallet signature is the only sign-in their own pages document
- Aevo
- Drift
- EVEDEX
- Extended
- GMX
- Jupiter Perps
- Lighter
- Orderly (WOOFi Pro)
8of 16
Off the register — an email or a social login opens an account as well
- ApeX Omni
- Aster
- dYdX
- edgeX
- gTrade
- Hyperliquid
- Ostium
- Paradex
An even split, read 18 September 2026. An email route still ends in a wallet the venue creates for the trader. What each one reserves the right to ask once a deposit lands is a column of its own in the table below.
What every venue asks for
Own documentation and terms, 18 September 2026
The row that matters most on this site, because the first column is the admission test. Sign-in is what the venue's own onboarding page describes; the documents column quotes what its terms say about identity checks, which is not always the same thing as the marketing page.
| Entry | What opens the door | Papers asked for | Check the terms reserve |
|---|---|---|---|
| AevoHybrid | Wallet connect | Terms: transactions only through your own wallet service | Nothing published |
| ApeX OmniHybrid | Wallet, or email with a Privy wallet | Docs state no KYC and no forms | States none |
| AsterOwn layer 1, operator-run | Wallet signature or email | Terms allow limited identity verification procedures | Right reserved |
| DriftPaused; fork runs as Velocity | Solana wallet | Self-custodial; no account to register | States none |
| dYdXApp-chain, validator-held book | Wallet signature, or Google, Apple or email | None to trade | Nothing published |
| edgeXHybrid | Wallet or MPC login | None in the user terms we read | Nothing published |
| EVEDEXHybrid | Wallet signature | None to trade; on-chain AML screening on deposits | Mechanism named |
| ExtendedHybrid | Wallet signature, EVM or Starknet | Terms reserve the right to deny access after a KYT risk assessment | Right reserved |
| GMXOracle pool | Wallet connect or passkey wallet | Docs state permissionless access, no KYC | States none |
| gTradeOracle vault | Email or social instant wallet, or a wallet | Docs state no signup and no deposit to start | States none |
| HyperliquidOn-chain order book | Wallet signature or email code | None in the onboarding documentation | Nothing published |
| Jupiter PerpsOracle pool | Solana wallet | Terms reserve the right to run KYC and AML checks | Right reserved |
| LighterHybrid, ZK-proven | Wallet signature | None in the documentation we read | Nothing published |
| Orderly (WOOFi Pro)Hybrid, not scored | Wallet through a front-end, EIP-712 signature | None stated; US addresses and sanctioned regions blocked | Nothing published |
| OstiumOracle vault | Email with a smart account, or a wallet | Site states no account approvals | States none |
| ParadexHybrid, Starknet appchain | Wallet signature; account derived from the address | None in the account documentation | Nothing published |
Mechanism named — the venue writes down how deposits are checked Right reserved — the terms allow a check without describing one States none — the documentation says access needs no approval Nothing published — neither the terms nor the docs say either way
Who may open an account is settled in each venue's terms, so read the ones that cover you. Every door and every clause above was read on 18 September 2026 in the venue's own pages. The test is applied to those pages rather than to the cell that summarises them, and one row shows why that matters: Paradex's sign-in cell records the signature route its account is derived from, while the wallet overview the cell was taken from also describes an embedded wallet opened from an email or a social account. That second route is what puts Paradex on the right-hand side of the figure above. Wherever a venue's own onboarding pages document a way in of that kind — an email, a social account, or a wallet the venue opens for the trader — the venue is outside the register, however cheap it is and however deep its book. A marketing page and a terms-of-use page rarely say the same thing in the same words, and when they disagree here the clause is the one quoted. Who a venue will deal with also depends on where you are, so find the terms that cover your own country before any money moves.
The scored venues, in order
One formula, fixed 21 September 2026
Four rows, because the board on this page is the register and the register is four entries long. Ten venues on this desk have an order book we could sample and a published fee schedule, and all ten carry a mark against the same five headings; the six missing here document a second door, so their marks are printed on the method page instead, where the boundary can be read against numbers rather than taken on trust. The door figure at the top of this page is where each of the sixteen is placed on one side of that line or the other.
| Place | Venue | Score of 5 | Maker / taker | Perp markets | Open interest | 24h volume |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | LighterHybrid, ZK-proven | 4.5 | 0% / 0% | 214 | $585.4 million | $2.0 billion |
| 02 | ExtendedHybrid | 3.9 | 0% / 0.025% | 325 | $84.0 million | $612.8 million |
| 03 | EVEDEXHybrid | 3.4 | 0.015% / 0.045% | 52 | $704.9 million | $700.5 million |
| 04 | AevoHybrid | 3.3 | 0.050% / 0.080% | 102 | $12.8 million | $7.7 million |
The bar beside each score is that score against the full scale, not against the venue above it. Open interest is the venue's own return, as CoinMarketCap listed it on 22 September 2026; What each criterion is worth, and how it is worked out, sits on how we score.
Where the resting orders sit
Our own reading, BTC perpetual
The onboarding terms come from the venues. This figure does not: each bar is the median value of resting orders within 10 basis points of the mid price on the BTC perpetual, both sides of the book, across every successful snapshot.
Each bar stands on 56 readings of that venue's own book, taken on 19 September 2026, ten minutes between readings, beginning just after midnight UTC. A venue priced against an oracle keeps no resting book to read, so none of them is filed in this figure.
Brief
What this site reads before it scores
No venue on this page asks a trader for a passport before the first perpetual position. They differ in what they ask for instead — a wallet signature, an email, a social login — and that difference is the whole subject of this desk. We read the onboarding pages and the terms of use of 16 venues, sorted them by the sign-in each one documents, then measured what the tables leave out: how much depth sits in each order book. Eight venues came out of that sorting with a wallet signature and nothing else behind the door, and four of those eight run an order book deep enough to rank.
Context
The test a venue has to pass to be entered here
A trader reaches a position on a perpetual venue by proving control of an address, or by opening an account with the venue and letting it hold something on their behalf. This desk files only the first kind. The wording of the test: the sign-in a venue's own onboarding pages document must be a signature from a wallet the trader already holds, with no email account, no social login and no wallet the venue opens for them behind it.
EVEDEX, Extended, Lighter and Aevo pass it among the venues with an order book, and Drift's Velocity fork, GMX, Jupiter Perps and Orderly pass it among the pool-priced ones. ApeX Omni, Aster, dYdX, edgeX, gTrade, Hyperliquid, Ostium and Paradex all document a second way in that an email address or a social account opens, usually with a wallet created for the trader at the other end, so none of them is entered. Paradex is the closest call and the one worth checking first: the signature route its account is derived from is the one the sign-in column above records, and the same wallet overview describes an embedded wallet opened from an email or a social account. Two of the eight still appear on this site, in head-to-head pages, because a comparison is not the register and the pages say so.
The test is not a judgement about which venue is better run. It is a boundary, published so that the list has one, and every cell it rests on is printed in the table above.
Detail
What "no KYC" actually means
It means no identity documents are collected to open a position. It does not mean nothing is checked. Deposits arrive on-chain, and on-chain addresses carry history: several venues describe automated screening of incoming funds, and most terms of use exclude sanctioned persons and a list of countries outright. Three venues in this list go further and reserve the right to request verification or to run a risk assessment before granting access. The table above records which venues reserve that right, in the words their own terms use.
Every page on this desk
Rankings, comparisons, method
Rankings
- No-KYC crypto exchange listthe register in full, ordered by what each entry asks for
- Best non-KYC venue for perpetual futuresscored on onboarding, custody, cost, markets and depth
- Wallet-only trading platformsthe same test applied to pool-priced venues as well
- Gold, oil and stock perpetuals without an accountfour venues placed by how many asset classes each one's market list documents
Lists and comparisons
- Perp DEX list by onboardingthe register ordered by what each entry documents about its checks
- Binance alternatives without documentsfor traders leaving a verified exchange account
- No-KYC venues comparedfees, custody and what the terms reserve
- EVEDEX vs Astera register entry against a venue the test keeps out
- Lighter vs edgeXonboarding and custody side by side, across the register line