Wallet First Venue onboarding reference

Onboarding and screening · September 2026

What venues ask for before you trade

One test decides who is entered here: the sign-in a venue's own onboarding pages document has to be a signature from a wallet the trader already holds, and nothing else beside it. Sixteen venues were read against that test, and the register is where the ones that pass are filed.

The venues on the register The test, and who it keeps out

The Wallet First review deskUpdated: Terms read 18 September 2026

What the door takes Every venue on this desk, sorted by the sign-in its own onboarding pages describe

8of 16

On the register — a wallet signature is the only sign-in their own pages document

  • Aevo
  • Drift
  • EVEDEX
  • Extended
  • GMX
  • Jupiter Perps
  • Lighter
  • Orderly (WOOFi Pro)

8of 16

Off the register — an email or a social login opens an account as well

  • ApeX Omni
  • Aster
  • dYdX
  • edgeX
  • gTrade
  • Hyperliquid
  • Ostium
  • Paradex

An even split, read 18 September 2026. An email route still ends in a wallet the venue creates for the trader. What each one reserves the right to ask once a deposit lands is a column of its own in the table below.

What every venue asks for

Own documentation and terms, 18 September 2026

The row that matters most on this site, because the first column is the admission test. Sign-in is what the venue's own onboarding page describes; the documents column quotes what its terms say about identity checks, which is not always the same thing as the marketing page.

EntryWhat opens the doorPapers asked forCheck the terms reserve
AevoHybrid Wallet connect Terms: transactions only through your own wallet service Nothing published
ApeX OmniHybrid Wallet, or email with a Privy wallet Docs state no KYC and no forms States none
AsterOwn layer 1, operator-run Wallet signature or email Terms allow limited identity verification procedures Right reserved
DriftPaused; fork runs as Velocity Solana wallet Self-custodial; no account to register States none
dYdXApp-chain, validator-held book Wallet signature, or Google, Apple or email None to trade Nothing published
edgeXHybrid Wallet or MPC login None in the user terms we read Nothing published
EVEDEXHybrid Wallet signature None to trade; on-chain AML screening on deposits Mechanism named
ExtendedHybrid Wallet signature, EVM or Starknet Terms reserve the right to deny access after a KYT risk assessment Right reserved
GMXOracle pool Wallet connect or passkey wallet Docs state permissionless access, no KYC States none
gTradeOracle vault Email or social instant wallet, or a wallet Docs state no signup and no deposit to start States none
HyperliquidOn-chain order book Wallet signature or email code None in the onboarding documentation Nothing published
Jupiter PerpsOracle pool Solana wallet Terms reserve the right to run KYC and AML checks Right reserved
LighterHybrid, ZK-proven Wallet signature None in the documentation we read Nothing published
Orderly (WOOFi Pro)Hybrid, not scored Wallet through a front-end, EIP-712 signature None stated; US addresses and sanctioned regions blocked Nothing published
OstiumOracle vault Email with a smart account, or a wallet Site states no account approvals States none
ParadexHybrid, Starknet appchain Wallet signature; account derived from the address None in the account documentation Nothing published

Mechanism named — the venue writes down how deposits are checked Right reserved — the terms allow a check without describing one States none — the documentation says access needs no approval Nothing published — neither the terms nor the docs say either way

Who may open an account is settled in each venue's terms, so read the ones that cover you. Every door and every clause above was read on 18 September 2026 in the venue's own pages. The test is applied to those pages rather than to the cell that summarises them, and one row shows why that matters: Paradex's sign-in cell records the signature route its account is derived from, while the wallet overview the cell was taken from also describes an embedded wallet opened from an email or a social account. That second route is what puts Paradex on the right-hand side of the figure above. Wherever a venue's own onboarding pages document a way in of that kind — an email, a social account, or a wallet the venue opens for the trader — the venue is outside the register, however cheap it is and however deep its book. A marketing page and a terms-of-use page rarely say the same thing in the same words, and when they disagree here the clause is the one quoted. Who a venue will deal with also depends on where you are, so find the terms that cover your own country before any money moves.

Venues read 16 order-book, hybrid and pool-priced, 10 of them with a book to mark
On the register eight of 16 a wallet signature is the only sign-in their own onboarding pages document
Ranked on these pages four of them the register entries that run an order book we could open and sample
Reserving the right to ask 3 of 16 terms that allow identity checks or a risk assessment before access
BTC orders within 10 bps $102.8 million across 10 order-book venues, median of 57 snapshots a book

The scored venues, in order

One formula, fixed 21 September 2026

Four rows, because the board on this page is the register and the register is four entries long. Ten venues on this desk have an order book we could sample and a published fee schedule, and all ten carry a mark against the same five headings; the six missing here document a second door, so their marks are printed on the method page instead, where the boundary can be read against numbers rather than taken on trust. The door figure at the top of this page is where each of the sixteen is placed on one side of that line or the other.

PlaceVenueScore of 5Maker / takerPerp marketsOpen interest24h volume
01 LighterHybrid, ZK-proven 4.5 0% / 0% 214 $585.4 million $2.0 billion
02 ExtendedHybrid 3.9 0% / 0.025% 325 $84.0 million $612.8 million
03 EVEDEXHybrid 3.4 0.015% / 0.045% 52 $704.9 million $700.5 million
04 AevoHybrid 3.3 0.050% / 0.080% 102 $12.8 million $7.7 million

The bar beside each score is that score against the full scale, not against the venue above it. Open interest is the venue's own return, as CoinMarketCap listed it on 22 September 2026; What each criterion is worth, and how it is worked out, sits on how we score.

Where the resting orders sit

Our own reading, BTC perpetual

The onboarding terms come from the venues. This figure does not: each bar is the median value of resting orders within 10 basis points of the mid price on the BTC perpetual, both sides of the book, across every successful snapshot.

EVEDEX $17.9 million4.12 bps median spread
Lighter $16.7 million0.01 bps median spread
Extended $7.3 million0.12 bps median spread
Aevo $3.8 million1.91 bps median spread

Each bar stands on 56 readings of that venue's own book, taken on 19 September 2026, ten minutes between readings, beginning just after midnight UTC. A venue priced against an oracle keeps no resting book to read, so none of them is filed in this figure.

Brief

What this site reads before it scores

No venue on this page asks a trader for a passport before the first perpetual position. They differ in what they ask for instead — a wallet signature, an email, a social login — and that difference is the whole subject of this desk. We read the onboarding pages and the terms of use of 16 venues, sorted them by the sign-in each one documents, then measured what the tables leave out: how much depth sits in each order book. Eight venues came out of that sorting with a wallet signature and nothing else behind the door, and four of those eight run an order book deep enough to rank.

Context

The test a venue has to pass to be entered here

A trader reaches a position on a perpetual venue by proving control of an address, or by opening an account with the venue and letting it hold something on their behalf. This desk files only the first kind. The wording of the test: the sign-in a venue's own onboarding pages document must be a signature from a wallet the trader already holds, with no email account, no social login and no wallet the venue opens for them behind it.

EVEDEX, Extended, Lighter and Aevo pass it among the venues with an order book, and Drift's Velocity fork, GMX, Jupiter Perps and Orderly pass it among the pool-priced ones. ApeX Omni, Aster, dYdX, edgeX, gTrade, Hyperliquid, Ostium and Paradex all document a second way in that an email address or a social account opens, usually with a wallet created for the trader at the other end, so none of them is entered. Paradex is the closest call and the one worth checking first: the signature route its account is derived from is the one the sign-in column above records, and the same wallet overview describes an embedded wallet opened from an email or a social account. Two of the eight still appear on this site, in head-to-head pages, because a comparison is not the register and the pages say so.

The test is not a judgement about which venue is better run. It is a boundary, published so that the list has one, and every cell it rests on is printed in the table above.

Detail

What "no KYC" actually means

It means no identity documents are collected to open a position. It does not mean nothing is checked. Deposits arrive on-chain, and on-chain addresses carry history: several venues describe automated screening of incoming funds, and most terms of use exclude sanctioned persons and a list of countries outright. Three venues in this list go further and reserve the right to request verification or to run a risk assessment before granting access. The table above records which venues reserve that right, in the words their own terms use.

Every page on this desk

Rankings, comparisons, method